SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1966 Supreme(All) 179

D.P.UNIYAL
Radhey Shyam Gupta – Appellant
Versus
The State – Respondent


Advocates:
R. Dwivedi, for Applicant; R.K. Shukla, Addl. Govt. Advocate, for Opposite Party.

ORDER :-This is an application to revise an order of the Sessions Judge upholding the jurisdiction of the Magistrate to proceed with the trial of the accused under Sec 353, I.P.C.

2. On an information lodged with the police a case under Secs. 228 and 353, I.P.C., was sent up against the accused to the Court of the Magistrate who framed charges against him in these terms :-

"Firstly, that you on or about the 17th day of August 1953 at about 4 p.m. in Civil Lines at the Registration Office, Orai, intentionally offered insult and caused interruption to R.S. Lal, Sub-Registrar, while he was sitting in a stage of judicial proceeding, namely, was registering a document, and thereby committed an offence under Sec. 228, I.P.C. Secondly, that you on the same day at the same time and place assaulted R.S. Lal, Sub-Registrar, a public servant, with intent to deter him and prevent him from discharging his duty of registering a deed as public servant, and thereby committed an offence punishable under Sec. 353, I.P.C."

3. An objection was raised on behalf of the accused challenging the jurisdiction of the Magistrate to take cognizance of the offence without a complaint in writing of the public serva















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top