SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1967 Supreme(All) 91

SATISHCHANDRA
Sheshnath – Appellant
Versus
Regional Transport Authority, Gorakhpur – Respondent


Advocates:
Sripat Sahai Srivastava, for Petitioner Standing Counsel, for Respondents.

Judgement

SATISH CHANDRA, J. :-The petitions was appointed as a bus conductor in the Uttar Pradesh Government Roadways. In respect of certain incidents that happened on 33-3 1963 the petitioner was charge-sheeted. He was asked to explain them and ultimately the matter was reported to the Regional Transport Authority. The matter was taken up by the Authority on 6-8-1966 in the presence of the petitioner. Ultimately, the Authority resolved to disqualify the petitioner from holding or obtaining a conductor's licence in Uttar Pradesh for a period of six months from the date of enforcement of this order in his licence. It was further resolved that the General Manager, U.P. Government Roadways, be requested to take strict disciplinary proceedings against the Petitioner. This order was passed under Sec. 21-F of the Motor Vehicles Act. Sub-Sec. (4) of Sec. 21-F runs as follows :-

Any person aggrieved by an order made under Sub-Sec. (1) may, within thirty days of the service on him of the order, appeal to the Prescribed Authority which shall decide the appeal after giving such person and the authority making the order an opportunity of being heard and the decision of the appellate authority s




Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top