SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1965 Supreme(All) 113

SATISHCHANDRA
Rashtriya Chini Mill Mazdoor Union – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
K.N. Singh, for Petitioners; Standing Counsel, for Opposite Parties.

ORDER :- These two writ petitions are under Article 226 of the Constitution. The facts of both are common and they raise identical questions Same persons have filed both these petitions. The first respondent in both of them is the State of Uttar Pradesh. In Writ Petition No. 2909 of 1962 Shankar Sugar Mills Ltd., Deoria, is the second respondent while in Writ Petition No. 2910 of 1962 the Punjab Sugar Mills Co. Ltd., Gorakhpur is the second respondent. These petitions pray that the notification dated 1-5-1962 of the State Government be quashed and that the State Government be directed to refer the industrial dispute for adjudication.

2. The impugned notification dated 1-5-62 purports to have been passed by the State Government in exercise of the powers conferred by section 3 of the U. P. Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (U. P. Act No. XXVIII of 1947). It directs 69 named vacuum pan sugar factories to pay to their employees amounts, by way of bonus for the crushing season 1960-61, shown against their names, within one month of the publication of the order. The Punjab Sugar Mills Co., Ltd., Gorakhpur is mentioned at serial No. 63 of the order and the amount of bonus to be paid by it is s






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top