SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1966 Supreme(All) 96

V.G.OAK
Shesh Narain Dikshit – Appellant
Versus
Savitri – Respondent


Advocates:
Satyendra Nath Verma, for Appellant; H.N. Seth, for Respondent.

JUDGMENT :- This is an appeal under the Hindu Marriage Act. Shesh Narain Dikshit filed a petition against Smt. Savitri Devi for judicial separation under Section 10 of the Hindu Marriage Act. The petition was dismissed by the learned Judge, Small Cause Court, Kanpur on 23-12-1957. This appeal by Shesh Narain Dikshit is directed against that judgment and decree, dated 23-12-1957.

2. Mr. H. N. Seth appearing for the respondent has raised a preliminary objection that the appeal is incompetent. He points out that the judgment under appeal was given by a Small Cause Court. He pointed out that under the Provincial Small Cause Courts Act no appeal lies from a decision of a court of Small Causes (Section 27 of Provincial Small Cause Courts Act).

3. The learned counsel for the appellant relies upon Section 28 of the Hindu Marriage Act. Section 28 of the Hindu Marriage Act states :

"All decrees and orders made by court in any proceeding under this Act shall be enforced in like manner as the decrees and orders of the Court made in the exercise of the original civil jurisdiction are enforced, and may be appealed from under any law for the time being in force,.........."

It will be seen that, altho
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top