SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1964 Supreme(All) 185

D.S.MATHUR
Ram Pratap – Appellant
Versus
Mohan Lal – Respondent


Advocates:
K.B. Verma, for Applicants.

ORDER :- This is a revision under S. 115, C. P. C. by Ram Pratap and another against the order dated 23-2-1963 of the Civil Judge of Gorakhpur dismissing their application, in substance, for setting aside the order confirming the sale.

2. After obtaining a final decree under Order XXXIV, Rule 5, C. P. C. for the recovery of the mortgage money by the sale of the mortgaged property Mohan Lal, decree-holder-opposite party No. 1, applied for execution of the decree. The decree was against Uma Shanker, opposite party No. 2, father of the present applicants. The property was auctioned on 18-12-1961 and was purchased by the decree-holder himself. On 12-10-1961 the applicants moved an application for permission to sue as pauper to obtain a declaration that the decree already obtained was void and the property in dispute was not liable to sale in execution of that decree. At the same time, an application was made to restrain the decree-holder, who was the defendant in that suit, from proceeding with the auction sale. However, the Civil Judge passed an order that the confirmation of the sale shall be stayed till the disposal of the application. This order was passed on the date of the presen













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top