SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1965 Supreme(All) 162

GANGESHWAR PRASAD
Bhojai – Appellant
Versus
Salim Ullah – Respondent


Advocates:
K.C. Saksena, for Appellant; Mohd. Hamid Husain, for Respondents.

JUDGMENT :- This is an appeal by a defendant, and it arises out of a suit for setting aside a final decree passed under O. XXXIV, R. 5. C. P. C. and the execution proceedings based thereon which terminated in the auction sale of a house belonging to the plaintiff, on the ground of fraud.

2. The house was purchased by Hayat Ullah plaintiff on 10-11-1937. Adjoining this house is a house owned by Sakhawat Ali and Hashmat Ali defendants Nos. 2 and 3 who are brothers. These houses are situate within the municipal limits of Allahabad. Formerly, both these houses were designated by one single municipal number, i.e., No. 136, but later the house in dispute was described as No. 136-A and the house owned by defendants Nos. 2 and 3 as No. 136 in the municipal records. Defendant No. 1, the Municipal Board of Allahabad, brought suit No. 174 of 1943 at Allahabad for the recovery of Rs. 16-12-0 as arrears of house and water taxes in respect of the houses against the plaintiff and defendants Nos. 2 and 3 and a preliminary decree for sale under O. XXXIV, R. 4 of the C. P. C. was passed in that suit on 11-4-1944. At the time of the suit the houses were not only described as No. 136 but were entered i







































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top