SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1966 Supreme(All) 52

GYANENDRA KUMAR
Chhotey Lal – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates:
Gopal Behari, for Applicants; Lalji Sinha, for Opposite Party.

ORDER :- This is a revision by the accused against the order of the Additional District Magistrate (Judicial) Bareilly dated 31st July, 1964 passed in a criminal revision filed by the complainant before him.

2. Briefly stated the facts of the case are that a charge-sheet dated 10-8-63 submitted by the Police under Section 332 I. P. C. against the accused was received in the court of the Judicial Magistrate (City), Bareilly on 24-4-64, which was duly recorded in the order sheet. The Magistrate registered the case. However, before he could issue summons of warrant, the accused made their appearance in court on that very date. They were accordingly supplied copies of the documents referred to in Section 173 Cr. P. C. The Magistrate then fixed 5-5-64 for the statement of the accused and framing of the charge.

3. On 5-5-64 the Magistrate, after hearing the parties, came to the conclusion that at the time of the occurrence the complainant was not engaged in the discharge of his public duties and as such no case under Section 332 I. P. C. was made out. He further found that an offence under Section 323 I. P. C. simpliciter prima facie existed against the accused. Therefore, by his order of













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top