SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1966 Supreme(All) 98

S.NKATJU
Union of India – Appellant
Versus
Ghasi Ram, Laxmi Narain – Respondent


Advocates:
Jagdish Swarup, for Appellant; Swami Dayal for Respondent.

JUDGMENT :- These are two appeals preferred by the defendant the Union of India. Second Appeal No. 1063 of 1959 arises out of suit No. 684 of 1956 which was instituted by the joint family firm of Messrs Prabhu Lal Ram Ratan Das through its Karta Sri Deoki Nandan. It prayed for an injuction restraining the defendant from realising a sum of Rs. 1091/8/- from the plaintiff Second Appeal No. 1062 of 1959 arises out of suit No. 736 of 1956 which was instituted by Messrs Ghasi Ram Laxmi Narain through Sri Ghasi Ram praying for a permanent injunction restraining the defendant from realising Rs. 2845/4/- from the plaintiff firm.

The plaintiffs in both the suits were dealers in tobacco and they sold tobacco under permits obtained from the Central Excise Department, Agra, to Messrs Ram Lal Jagannath, dealers in tobacco at Jhansi. It was alleged that duty of -/6/- per lb was paid on the aforesaid goods in accordance with law, but subsequently on 21-3-1956 notices were issued to the plaintiffs under rule 10A of the rules framed under the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) calling upon the plaintiffs to pay an additional duty at /-8/-per lb. on the aforesaid





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top