SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1964 Supreme(All) 219

M.H.BEG
Rajendra Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates:
A. Banerji, for Appellant :A., for Respondent.

JUDGMENT : The appellant has been convicted under Ss. 471 and 473 read with Ss. 466 and 474, I.P.C. and has been sentenced to two years R. 1. and a fine of Rs. 500 for each of the two offences. He has also been convicted under S. 9 of the Central Excises and Salt Act, and sentenced to six months' R. I. The sentences were directed to run concurrently.

2. It was alleged that the appellant was caught travelling in a truck in which he was trying to carry some contraband tobacco without the required permit, on 9th of June, 1960, at about 11.30 p.m. Information had been received by Sri C.P. Anand (P.W. 1), Superintendent, Central Excise, Kannauj, who was camping at Gursahaiganj, that a truck loaded with tobacco, on which no duty had been paid, was to be found in Chhibramau Tahsil, in district Farrukhabad, coming from Purabhoj on the Grand Trunk Road. Consequently, the Superintendent of Central Excise arranged two parties, one headed by Sri R.D. Kapil and another by Sri A.M. Warse. The party of Sri R.D. Kapil was posted at Gursahaiganj Railway Crossing and the party of Sri A.M. Warse was directed to proceed to Furabhoj. Information was also sent to Sri S.P. Bakshi, Deputy Superintendent,












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top