SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1964 Supreme(All) 234

D.S.MATHUR
Ganga Dei – Appellant
Versus
Munia – Respondent


Advocates:
V.K.S. Chaudhary, for Applicants; R.R. Misra, for Opposite Party.

ORDER : This is a revision under S. 115, C.P.C. by Smt. Ganga Dei and others to challenge the order, dated 18-9-62 of the District Judge of Banda passed in an appeal and thereby directing that one succession certificate shall be granted to Smt. Sia Dulari and Girish Chandra, applicants Nos. 6 and 7, in respect of 13/14 share of the cash left by Girdhari Lal, deceased, in the Kanpur Head Post Office and another succession certificate to Smt. Munia, opposite party, in respect of the remaining 1/14 share on payment of the necessary court-fee.

2. The order is challenged on the ground that under the law only one succession certificate could be granted. It, however, appears to me that the applicants moved this revision to somehow deprive Smt. Munia of her rights which, it may be mentioned, have been upheld by the lower Courts though that decision can be challenged in a regular suit. Even though the applicants do not appear to have been acting with a good intention, the Courts shall have to dispose of the matter in accordance with the law even if parties are put to inconvenience and may have to indulge in other litigation.

3. A perusal of the provisions of the Succession Act shall make it c








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top