SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1964 Supreme(All) 232

H.C.P.TRIPATHI
Ravendra Kaur – Appellant
Versus
Achant Swarup – Respondent


Advocates:
R.K. Shangloo, for Applicant; K.L. Grover, for Opposite Party.

ORDER : Applicant Rabindra Kaur made an application to the Sub-Divisional Officer Sadar at Muzaffarnagar praying that the maintenance allowance of Rs. 25 per month granted in her favour on the 2nd of March 1955 be increased to Rs. 100 as the circumstances of the respondent had changed during the period. Respondent Achint Swarup filed a written statement before the Magistrate alleging that the Court of the Additional Civil Judge, Muzaffarnagar had granted him a decree for judicial separation from the applicant and, therefore, the maintenance allowance which had been granted to the applicant earlier was not payable. He also filed a copy of the decree passed by the Court showing that he was allowed judicial separation from the applicant. On these facts the learned Magistrate rejected the application of Rabindra Kaur for enhancing her maintenance allowance and also passed an order cancelling his previous order of the 2nd of March 1955 granting her a maintenance allowance.

2. On revision the learned Sessions Judge was of the opinion that the view of law taken by the Magistrate was incorrect and that it was not legal on his part to have set aside his previous order allowing maintenance to







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top