SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1964 Supreme(All) 225

R.S.PATHAK
Peeran w/o Abdul Razzaq – Appellant
Versus
Hafiz Mohammad Ishaq – Respondent


Advocates:
S.A. Banerjee and K.C. Agarwal, for Appellant; C.B. Misra, for Respondents.

JUDGMENT :- This appeal raised two important questions of law concerning the Validity of a wakf under the Mohammedan Law.

2. One Qudarulullah owned a house, No. 474, Mohalla Colonelganj, Allahabad. Upon his death it devolved upon his widow Subban, his daughter Peeran and his brother Iddu, their shares being 2 annas, 8 annas and 6 annas respectively. Subban died leaving a daughter Rahiman from her first husband, and her two annas share in the house devolved on Rahiman. On September, 8, 1936, Iddu executed a deed of wakf dedicating his six annas share in the house for the upkeep and maintenance of the Bara Imambara mosque. Similarly, on September 7, 1938, Rahiman executed a deed of wakf dedicating her two annas share in the house to the same purpose. Under the two deeds of wakf Hafiz Mohammad Ishaq was appointed Mutwalli. Thus a share of eight annas in the house became the subject of a wakf devoted to the purpose mentioned above, while the remaining share of eight annas continued to belong to Peeran. The house was let out to tenants on rent, and it appears that the entire rent was realised by Peeran.

3. Accordingly, the suit out of which the instant appeal arises, was instituted by Ha
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top