SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1965 Supreme(All) 32

D.S.MATHUR
Uma Shankar Mehrotra – Appellant
Versus
Kanodia Brothers, Kanpur – Respondent


Advocates:
S.N. Kachar, for Applicant; M.N. Shukla, for Opposite Party.

ORDER : This is a revision under S. 115, C.P.C. by Uma Shankar Mehrotra against the order dated 5-12-1962 of the First Civil Judge of Kanpur, framing two issues for trial and determination as necessary under O. XXI, R. 50(2). C.P.C.

2. The material facts of the case are that Messrs. Kanodia Brothers Kanpur, obtained an ex parte decree against Messrs. S. Varma, Kanpur for the recovery of a sum of Rs. 11,500. Messrs. S. Varma, defendant, was to be served through the proprietors. Bhupat Prasad and Uma Shankar Mehrotra. They put in appearance, but Uma Shankar Mehrotra denied to be a partner or proprietor of the defendant-firm. The ex parte decree was passed on 6-7-1955. It was on 27-7-1957 that the decree-holder applied for execution of the decree by the attachment of the salary of Uma Shankar Mehrotra on the supposition that the case was covered by Cls. (b) and (c) of O. XXI. R. 50(1), C.P.C. The executing court recorded the finding that without the grant of the leave under sub-rule (2) of O. XXI. R. 50, C.P.C., the execution could not proceed against Uma Shankar Mehrotra and this order was eventually maintained.

It was thereafter on 29-8-1961 that the decree-holder made a fresh applica




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top