SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1966 Supreme(All) 61

RAJESHWARI PRASAD
B. D. Naithani – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
K.V. Seth, for Appellant; Standing Counsel, for Respondent.

JUDGMENT :- This is defendant's appeal. The suit giving rise to the present second appeal was filed by the State of Uttar Pradesh against the defendant-appellant for recovery of a sum of Rs. 2,700.

2. The plaintiff's case was that the; plaintiff carried on transport business under the name and style of U.P. Government Roadways throughout the State of Uttar Pradesh; the defendant was an Army Service Corps Contractor in the year 1950; the defendant as such had to supply all types of transport to the Military Officers at Dehradun; that there was a contract between the plaintiff and the defendant, whereby the defendant used to secure vehicles from the plaintiff-appellant from time to time to fulfil his obligation to supply transport vehicles to the Army Service Corps; the defendant had undertaken to pay the hire charges to the plaintiff for the same. From 28th April 1950 to 26th September, 1950, the plaintiff supplied to the defendant transport vehicles for the use of the Military Officers on different dates and a sum of Rs. 6,223-11-9 became due to the plaintiff from the defendant on account of the said hire charges. The plaintiff, however, filed suit for recovery of Rs. 2,700 only.

3.















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top