D.S.MATHUR
Bittan Devi – Appellant
Versus
Rudra Sen Bajpai – Respondent
2. The material facts of the case are that Rudra Sen Bajpai, opposite party No. 1, instituted a suit for partition of his 1/24th share in the properties in dispute belonging to the parties Kashi Narain Bajpai, since dead and now represented by applicants Nos. 1 2 and 6, and applicants Nos. 3 to 5, were defendants Nos. 1 to 4 in the suit. The other defendants Nos. 5 to 10 are the present opposite parties Nos. 2 to 7. There was a compromise between the parties whereunder the share of the plaintiff and of defendants Nos. 5 to 10 was held to be one-third and of defendant Nos. 1 to 4 two-third. A preliminary decree was passed accordingly, but it appears that neither the plaintiff, nor defendants Nos. 5 to 10, took steps for the passing of the final decree Defendants Nos. 5 to 10 had also not paid any court-fee for the separation of their share.
3. When no steps were taken by the plaintiff and defendants Nos. 5 to 10 for the separ
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.