SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1964 Supreme(All) 70

V.G.OAK, GYANENDRA KUMAR, GANGESHWAR PRASAD
Kedar Nath – Appellant
Versus
Jamuna – Respondent


Advocates:
R. B. Misra, for Appellant; V. B. L. Srivaslava, for Respondents.

Judgement

OAK, J. : This second appeal arises out of a suit for ejectment. In 1940, Kedar Math appellant filed a suit against the present respondents for their ejectment under S. 180, U.P. Tenancy Act (hereafter referred to as the Tenancy Act). That suit was decreed; and the appellant obtained possession. Subsequently the respondents were reinstated under S. 27 of U.P. Tenancy (Amendment) Act (No. X of 1947 - hereafter referred to as the 1947 Act). Soon after the respondents' reinstatement, the appellant, filed the present suit, out of which this second appeal has arisen. This civil suit for the defendants' ejectment was decreed by the First Additional Munsif of Gorakhpur. The defendants appealed. The appeal was allowed by the learned Civil Judge of Gorakhpur; and the plaintiff's suit was dismissed. The learned Civil Judge held that a person who was reinstated under S. 27 of the 1947 Act is not liable to be ejected again. Kedar Nath plaintiff has, therefore, come up in second appeal.

2. When the second appeal came tip for hearing before a learned Single Judge, the appellant relied upon a decision by a Division Bench of this Court in "Sri Ram Pathak v. Board of Revenue, U.P. 1956 All
































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top