SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1964 Supreme(All) 138

SATISHCHANDRA
Kedarnath – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates:
S. N. Mulla and Bhagwat Pd. Gupta, for Applicant; for Opposite Party.

Judgement

ORDER : This is a revision by one Kedar Nath, against his conviction under R. 409, I.P.C. and sentence of three years' rigorous imprisonment.

2. In the district of Deoria there is a Cooperative Federation at a place known as Bodarwar. In the beginning of the year lass the Federation resolved to run a brickkiln and by resolution No. 3 dated 13-1-1958 the Federation resolved inter-alia that a Manager and a Chaukidar be engaged for running the brick-kiln (Vide page 21 of the Minute Book Ex. VIII). On 23-1-1958 by resolution No. 4 (Ex.Ka.16) the Federation decided to appoint Kedar Nath, the applicant, as Manager on a monthly salary of Rs. 55/-. The Federation held a meeting on 1-3-1958 in which it appointed a committee for the supervision of the brick-kiln by resolution No. 5-B. This committee consisted of several gentlemen other than the applicant, the Manager. This resolution also stated that the entire responsibility in respect of the brick-klin shall be of the Manager as well as of the Managing Committee. The applicant admittedly worked as the Manager of the brick-kiln.

3. It appears that after sometime the applicant was suspended from the office of the Manager as certain co

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top