SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1963 Supreme(All) 178

D.S.MATHUR
Ulwar Singh – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates:
D. P. Agarwal, for Applicant; Advocate-General, for Opposite Party.

Judgement

D.S. MATHUR, J. :- This is a revision application by Ulwar Singh to challenge his conviction of an offence punishable under S. 6 of the U.P. Control of Supplies (Temporary Powers) Act, 1947, as re-enacted under S.2 of the U.P. Control of Supplies (Temporary Powers) Act, 1953, and continued in force by Act VIII of 1955 for contravention of Cl. 3 (2) of the U.P. Bricks Control Order, 1956 (to be referred hereinafter as the Order). He has been awarded a fine of Rs. 1000/- and at the same time the stock of bricks burnt by him in contravention of the Order was forfeited.

2. The facts of the case are not in dispute. They are that the applicant burnt bricks for sale with firewood without obtaining the permission of the District Magistrate as was necessary under Cl. 3(2) of the Order. However, it was asserted in defence that he had burnt the bricks after obtaining a licence from the Gram Panchayat. Such a licence, if obtained, could not exonerate him of the offence. In other words, the order of conviction can be set aside only if the order is unconstitutional.

3. The learned Advocate for the applicant has challenged the validity of the Order on the ground that unrestrained and arbit









































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top