SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1964 Supreme(All) 121

D.S.MATHUR
Mahabirji Birajman Mandir – Appellant
Versus
Prem Narain Shukla – Respondent


Advocates:
A. N. Varma, for Appellant; Mahesh Narain Shukla, for Respondent.

Judgement

JUDGMENT :- This is an appeal by Sidh Mahabirji Birajman Mandir through Pandit Mahabir Prasad Dixit and by Mahabir Prasad Dixit himself, defendants, against the order of the lower appellate Court allowing the appeal and remanding the suit for a fresh hearing after affording the plaintiff, Prem Narain Shukla, an opportunity to produce his evidence in the case which was permitted by the trial Court under order dated 10-3-1961. It was also ordered that the defendants would be entitled to give evidence in rebuttal. This order was made subject to another direction that the trial Court will look into the question of privilege if raised in a proper manner and by a competent authority.

2. The plaintiff had instituted the present suit for demolition of the wall which the defendants had constructed by the side of the windows in the western wall of his house and thereby stopping the tree flow of air and light through such windows, and also for a mandatory injunction to restrain the defendants from interfering with the plaintiff's construction of a shed to protect the rain water from reaching the room through the said windows and from interfering with the plaintiffs using the windows a
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top