SUNIL AMBWANI, KASHI NATH PANDEY
SEEMA CONSTRUCTIONS COMPANY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent
By the Court.— Heard Sri Pankaj Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner. Learned standing counsel appears for respondents.
2. By this writ petition, the petitioner, a Government contractor, is challenging the Cess imposed under the Building and Other Construction Workers’ Welfare Cess Act, 1996, notified in the State of U.P. w.e.f. 26.3.2010.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that under the contract with Public Works Department, he is paying minimums wages to his workers. The workers working with the petitioners are not registered as the beneficiary of the fund and thus he is not required to pay the Cess under the Act.
4. The Workers’ Welfare Cess have been notified under Section 3 of the Building and Other Construction Workers’ Welfare Cess Act, 1996. The Act provides for levy and collection of a cess on the cost of construction incurred by employers with a view to augmenting the resources of the Building and Other Construction Workers’ Welfare Boards constituted under the Building and Other Construction Workers’ (Regulation of Employment and Conditions of Service) Act, 1996. The Cess prescribed under the rules under Section 2 (c), is to be levied and co
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.