SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(All) 1475

[2010(6) ADJ 183 (DB)]
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
BEFORE : VIJAY MANOHAR SAHAI AND RAJ MANI CHAUHAN, JJ.
KHALID NIZAMI @ SULLU .....Petitioner
Versus
STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS ....Respondents
(Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 53799 of 2006, decided on 28th April, 2010)

Advocates:
Counsel :
Barmeshwar Nath Tiwari, H.R. Mishra and M.N. Singh for the Petitioner; Prabhakar Awasthi, W.H. Khan, Dev Pratap Singh and Pankaj Rai, Addl. C.S.C. for the Respondents.

Headnote:Constitution of India, 1950—Article 226—Partnership Act, 1932—Section 69(2)—Writ petition filed by a partner as well as attorney holder of unregistered partnership firm—In his personal capacity—Against State Government and Zila Panchayat, etc.—Whether maintainable—Question of—Considered by High Court and found that in view of Section 69(2), writ petition is not maintainable, as bar regarding its non-registration applies—Such writ petition, as such, deserves dismissal as not maintainable. [Paras 12 and 13]

       Result; Petition Dismissed.

       

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble Raj Mani Chauhan, J.—This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the petitioner Khalid Nizami @ Sullu, S/o Sheikh Mohammad Nizamuddin, R/o Yusufpur, Railway Station, District Ghazipur against the respondents State of U.P. through the Secretary, Ministry of Panchayat Raj/Local Self Government of U.P., Lucknow and 4 others for the following reliefs:

(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus declaring clause (8) of the bye-laws framed by Zila Panchayat, Ballia approved by the Commissioner Azamgarh Division, Azamgarh and published in the U.P. Gazette dated 23.8.1997 filed as Annexure No. 7 to the writ petition as ultra vires article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution of India; and ultra vires of Sec. 239(2) clause (H) sub-clause (1) of the U.P. Kshetra Panchayats and Zila Panchayats Adhiniyam 1961 and clause (xxii) of part A of Schedule-2 of the Adhiniyam 1961; and the Model bye-laws framed by the State Government vide notification dated 14.2.1995.

(ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the order dated 26.4.2003 passed by the Upper Mukhya Adhikari Zila Panchayat Ballia, in exercise of his powers as licensing authority vested under the bye-laws framed by the Zila Panchayat Ballia, filed as Annexure No. 4 to the writ petition.

(iii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus restraining the respondents from interfering in the holding of cattle fair by the petitioner in the Bhumidhari land situate in Mauza Bharauli Khas and Baghama Khurd, Pargana Garh, District Ballia.

(iv) Issue any other writ, order or direction which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.

(v) To award cost of the writ petition to the petitioner.

2. The relevant facts giving rise to the present writ petition may be summarized as under:

The dispute relates to holding of a cattle fair in Mauza Bharauli Khas and Baghama Khurd, Pargana Garh, District Ballia. As per allegation in the petition the revenue plots on which the cattle fair is being held belong to as many as 159 persons who are Bhumidhar of the plots. The petitioner and all the 159 Bhumidhars entered into a partnership agreement on 31.12.1994 to hold a cattle fair on the above plots. They executed deed of partnership in support of their partnership agreement. They executed a registered power of attorney in favour of petitioner for holding cattle fair to institute or defend suit and to manage the fair etc without right to sell those plots. As per partnership agreement, the petitioner was allowed 50% of the profits earned from the fair which was to be held thrice in a year. The petitioner has alleged that he has been holding cattle fair thrice in a year on the plots under the partnership agreement since before 1990. The Zila Panchayat, Ballia also claimed that it was holding a cattle fair in Mauza Bharauli Khas and Baghama Khurd, Pargana Garh, District Ballia since 1976. The Zila Panchayat, Ballia, thereafter created some interference in holding the cattle fair to the petitioner. Therefore, the petitioner had to file original Civil Suit No. 155 of 1995 in Civil Court, Ballia for permanent injunction against Zila Panchayat, Ballia for restraining it as well as its officers from causing any interference in holding the cattle fair. The petitioner moved an application under Order XXXIX, Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure for ad interim injunction which was allowed by the Trial Court. The Trial Court vide order dated 4th May, 1995 granted temporary injunction in favour of the petitioner with the following two conditions:

(i) The opposite parties-defendants were restrained by temporary injunction from interfering in the plaintiff’s holdings of cattle fair till according to the Government order the bye-laws are framed by the Zila Panchayat and approved by the Divisional Commissioner, published in the official Gazette and enforced.

(ii) The opposite parties-
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

SupremeToday

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top