SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(All) 1354

RAKESH TIWARI
KESHAV PRASAD JAISWAL – Appellant
Versus
SITA RAM – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
Namwar Singh and Sanjeev Singh for the Appellant; Vinod Swaroop for the Opposite Parties.

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble Rakesh Tiwari, J.—Heard Sri Namwar Singh, Advocate assisted by Sri Sanjeev Singh, Advocate, learned counsel for the appellant, Sri Vinod Swaroop, Advocate, learned counsel for the respondents and perused the record.

2. This second appeal has been filed against by the appellant challenging the validity and correctness of the judgment and decree dated 15.4.1976 passed by Ist Additional District Judge, Ghazipur in Civil Appeal No. 41 of 1971 arising out of Original Suit No. 82 of 1966 between Sheodani Ram v. Ram and others.

3. On 10.5.1976 the appeal was admitted and notices were issued.

4. The relief sought by this appeal is for setting aside the judgment and decrees of the Courts below and to dismiss the suit of the defendant-respondent No. 1 with costs through out or grant such other and further relief as this Court deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.

5. The brief facts culled out from the record are that Sita Ram/plaintiff-respondent filed suit No. 82 of 1966 on 22.3.1966 alleging that he, Ram Adhar Ram, defendant No. 7 and Shyamchandar Prasad, defendant No. 8, are related to one another through family of Narayan Sahu. According to family




































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top