[2010(6) ADJ 618]
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
BEFORE : RAVINDRA SINGH, J.
RAJESH KUMAR YADAV (DR.) ….Applicant
Versus
STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER …..Opposite Parties
(Criminal Misc. Application No. 29565 of 2009, decided on 25th March, 2010)
Result; Application Allowed.
Hon’ble Ravindra Singh, J.—This application has been filed by the applicant Rajesh Kumar Yadav (Dr.) with a prayer to quash the proceedings of case No. 768 of 2009 arising out of charge-sheet dated 27.3.2009 submitted in case crime No. 70 of 2007 under Sections 498-A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and Section ¾ D.P. Act, P.S. Mahila Thana, District Allahabad, pending in the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate-I, Allahabad.
2. Heard Sri Alok Kumar Yadav, learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State of U.P. and Sri Brijraj appearing on behalf of O.P. No. 2 Raj Bahadur Yadav.
3. It is contended by learned counsel for the applicant that in the present case the marriage of the applicant was solemnized with Smt. Anuradha, daughter of O.P. No. 2 Raj Bahadur Yadav, after marriage some disputes and differences had arisen between the husband and wife which resulted in lodging the FIR against the applicant and his family members. The FIR was lodged by Raj Bahadur Yadav against the applicant and his family members in case crime No. 70 of 2007 under Sections 498-A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and Section ¾ D.P. Act, P.S. Mahila Thana, District Allahabad, the FIR dated 18.12.2007 lodged against the applicant and others was challenged by the applicant by way of filing criminal Misc. Writ Petition No. 2461 of 2009 before this Court, on that writ petition the matter was referred to Mediation and conciliation Centre of this Court vide order dated 16.2.2009. The applicant and his wife Smt. Anuradha appeared before Mediation and conciliation Centre of this Court where they voluntarily arrived an amicable solution resolving the above mentioned disputes and differences, they have voluntarily and on their own free will arrived at a settlement agreement on dated 7.6.2009. The settlement has been mentioned in para-6 of settlement agreement dated 7.6.2009. Paragraph-6 of settlement agreement is hereby quoted as under :
“6. The following settlement has been arrived at between the Parties hereto:
a. That Sri Rajesh Kumar Yadav S/o Sri Samala Prasad Yadav (Applicant No. 11- Husband) and Smt. Anuradha W/o Sri Rajesh Kumar Yadav D/o Sri Raj Bahadur Yadav (Daughter of O.P. No. 4- Wife) have agreed for divorce by mutual consent.
b. That the applicant has agreed to pay to the O.P. No. 2 Smt. Anuradha Rs. 4 lacs as full and final payment towards maintenance and permanent alimony by bank draft in favour of Smt. Anuradha.
c. That the applicant in pursuance of said agreed alimony amount has brought a Bank Draft No. 392730 of State Bank of India Akharpur Bhopal Branch dated 29.5.2009 of Rs. 2,40,000/- and Bank Draft No. 534474 of Rs. 1,50,000/- and Bank Draft No. 4477123 of Rs. 10,000/- in favour of Smt. Anuradha Yadav payable at Allahabad.
d. That the O.P. No. 2 Smt. Anuradha has received the aforesaid Bank Drafts today. She has no further claim whatsoever against the applicant No. 1 and his family members.
e. That the O.P. No. 2 has obtained an exparte order in maintenance case No. 226 of 2008, Anurdha Yadav v. Rajesh Yadav, passed by the Principal Judge, Family Court, Allahabad wherein the applicant was directed to pay Rs. 3,000/- per month to the O.P. No. 2 from the date of order i.e. 6.2.2009. However, the applicant No. 1 has paid Rs. 9,000/- in cash to day to the O.P. No. 2.
f. That both the parties agree that permanent alimony amount which has been accepted today shall include the maintenance amount awarded under order dated 6.2.2009 by the Family Court Allahabad and no further maintenance shall be payable by Sri Rajesh Kumar to his wife Smt. Anuradha.
g. That in view of the above noted conditions of this settlement, both the parties agree that this compromise shall be treated as their consent for mutual divorce and all the criminal and civil cases filed by the O.P. No. 2 shall be treated to withdrawn and the divorce decree to be pass for all practical purposes.
h. That O.P. No. 2 has also agreed that she will have no objection if the Hon’ble Court may allow the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.