SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(All) 2178

RAKESH TIWARI
VINOD KUMAR GUPTA – Appellant
Versus
DEEPA GUPTA – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
Ratnesh Kumar Pandey, P.K. Singh and S.S. Shukla for the Petitioner; A.K. Sharma for the Respondent.

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble Rakesh Tiwari, J.—The case peremptorily listed today. List has been revised. Heard learned counsel for the appellant and perused the record. Sri A.K. Sharma, learned counsel for the respondent is not present.

2. The appellant filed Original Suit No. 447 of 1995, Dr. Vinod Kumar Gupta v. Smt. Deepa Gupta, under Section 13 of Hindu Marriage Act for divorce against the respondent. The suit was decreed vide judgment and order dated 29.8.1998 passed by the Ist Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Muzaffarnagar.

3. Aggrieved by the judgment and order dated 29.8.1998 the respondent filed Civil Appeal No. 333 of 1998, Smt. Deepa Gupta v. Dr. Vinod Kumar Gupta, before first lower appellate Court which was allowed vide judgment and order dated 25.10.2000.

4. It appears from the order-sheet dated 9.9.2009 that the Court had granted opportunity to the learned counsel for the parties as to whether there is any possibility of husband and wife stay and live together. Thereafter, the case was listed on 22.2.2010 when it was directed to be listed in the next cause list on the prayer of learned counsel for the parties. Since then, learned counsel for the respondent has not appea












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top