SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(All) 2049

S.C.AGARWAL
SHAMIM AHAMAD @ MUNNOO – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
R.N. Pandey and D.N. Pandey for the Appellants; Dharmendra Srivsatava, A.G.A. for the Respondent.

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble S.C. Agarwal, J.—This criminal appeal has been filed against judgment and order dated 23rd December, 1981 passed by the 7th Addl. Sessions Judge, Azamgarh in S.T. No. 236 of 1989 whereby the appellants Shamim Ahmad was convicted under Section 307 IPC and sentenced to undergo R.I. for four years. Appellants Shamshul Huda, Shamshul Haq and Saghir Ahmad were convicted under Section 307 read with Section 34 IPC and were sentenced to undergo R.I. for 3 ½ years.

2. Appellant No. 4 Saghir Ahmad had died as per the office report dated 11th April, 2007 and the report of the C.J.M. Agamgarh dated 23rd March, 2007. The appeal of appellant Saghir Ahmad stands abated on account of his death.

3. The incident took place on 20.4.1979 at 6 a.m. The FIR was lodged by Sri Razi Ahmad (P.W-1) on the same day on 8.30 a.m. at P.S. Ghosi, District-Agamgarh.

4. The prosecution case, as contained in the FIR is that there was previous enmity between the parties and a criminal case was pending against the appellants. On 20.4.1979 at 6 a.m., the accused Shamshul Haq, Shamim Ahmad @ Munnoo, Shamshul Huda and Saghir Ahmad came on the khalian of the complainant. Shamshul Haq was armed with a gun.





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top