S.C.AGARWAL
RIPUDAMAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent
Hon’ble S.C. Agarwal, J.—This criminal revision is directed against the order dated 22.5.2010 passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court No. 1, Jaunpur in Sessions Trial No. 600 of 2001, State v. Ripudaman and others, whereby the Court below allowed the application moved by the complainant Ram Sagar Ram under Section 216 Cr.P.C. for altering the charge.
2. Heard learned counsel for the revisionists and learned A.G.A. for the State.
3. There is no need to issue notice to the complainant.
4. Initially, charge under Sections 147, 148, 323/34, 325/34, 504, 427 I.P.C. And 3 (1) X S.C./S.T. Act were framed against the revisionists. An application under Section 216 Cr.P.C. was moved by the complainant for addition of charge under Section 379 I.P.C. on the ground that accused persons, at the time of incident, took away saria, cement, chairs etc. from the place of occurrence.
5. Learned Judge found that the accused persons came on the land of the complainant, took away saria, cement and chairs, damaged the wall, beat the complainant and his father, attempted to snatch the licensed revolver of complainant’s father. The accused persons were more than five in numbers and, th
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.