VINEET SARAN, RAN VIJAI SINGH
RAJNI CHAUHAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent
By the Court.—The petitioner is a registered contractor of category ‘A’ with the respondent No. 2. She is aggrieved by order dated 23.1.2004 passed by Regional Food Controller Agra Division,Agra (the respondent No. 2) by which the petitioner’s registration as Class ‘A’ contractor has been cancelled and the petitioner has been black listed. The impugned order has been assailed on the ground that the same has been passed without affording any opportunity of hearing to the petitioner.
2. A counter-affidavit has been filed by the respondents. In paragraph 5 of the counter-affidavit it is stated that the petitioner had got herself registered under category ‘A’ after concealing material facts, therefore,it was not necessary to afford an opportunity before passing the order dated 23.1.2004.
3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has submitted that had there been any illegality or misrepresentation/fraud committed by the petitioner while obtaining the registration, it should have been informed to the petitioner in the form of show cause notice so that she could rebut the same but without notice the order should not have been passed as the cancellation of registration will
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.