SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(All) 2384

RAM AUTAR SINGH
USHA – Appellant
Versus
MAHENDRA PAL SINGH – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
R.N. Maurya for the Revisionists; A.G.A. for the Respondents.

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble Ram Autar Singh, J.—This revision has been filed against the judgment and order dated 24.10.2008 passed by Principal Judge, Family Court, Bareilly in Case No. 1123 of 2005 (Smt. Usha and others v. Mahendra Pal Singh).

2. It transpires from the record that an application was moved by the revisionist No. 1 Smt. Usha under Section 125 Cr.P.C. for maintenance allowance of revisionists No. 2 to 4 with this allegation that the revisionist No. 1 Smt. Usha was married with respondent No. 1 Mahendra Pal Singh on 3.4.1990 and out of their wedlock revisionists No. 2 to 4, namely, Km. Sakshi, Km. Nishtha and Umang were born and thereafter dissolution of their marriage under Section 13-B of Hindu Marriage Act took place. The respondent No. 1 is a B.A.M.S. doctor and he has been living separately from his family for last two years and earning Rs. 15,000/- per month out of his agricultural land apart from income out of his medical practice. Before dissolution of marriage the respondent No. 1 has also married with another woman belonging to Tanakpur District Champawat (Uttrakhand), who has been working as teacher in Primary School and earning Rs. 1500/ per month. Each of the revisi












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top