Hon’ble Ram Autar Singh, J.—This revision has been filed against the order dated 3.5.1999 passed by IIIrd Additional Session Judge, Mainpuri in S.T. No. 367 of 1998 whereunder respondent No. 2 Akhilesh Kumar has been discharged under Sections 498-A, 304-B and 201 I.P.C., P.S. Bhogaon, District Mainpuri.

2. I have heard Shri Brij Raj Singh, learned counsel for the revisionist and learned A.G.A. for respondent No. 1 on this revision and perused the record. None has appeared on behalf of respondent No. 2 to oppose this revision.

3. The learned counsel for the revisionist has contended that the offences under Sections 498-A, 304-B and 201 I.P.C are made out against the respondent No. 2 but the Court below has passed perverse order, because after marriage a constant demand of scooter in the form of Rs. 22,000/- was made by the respondent No. 2, which was not fulfilled and thereafter two months from marriage the victim was murdered. The respondent No. 2 also committed cruelty with the deceased during her life time, as a result of which she informed her parents by writing a letter dated 5.7.1994. The father of respondent No. 2 himself sent a letter to the revisionist on 16.1.1994