Hon’ble Ashok Bhushan, J.—Heard Sri D.S.P. Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri B.D. Pandey, learned counsel appearing for respondent Nos. 2, 3 and 4 and learned Standing Counsel.

2. Counter and rejoinder affidavits have been exchanged between the parties and with the consent of the parties, the writ petition is being finally disposed of.

3. By this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for quashing the order dated 13th October, 2009 whereby the petitioner has been suspended.

4. Brief facts necessary for deciding the writ petition are; the petitioner was appointed as Reader in the University, Department of Biotechnology. The services of the petitioner were terminated by the University vide order dated 5th December, 2008. A writ petition being Writ Petition No. 65975 of 2008 was filed by the petitioner, which was disposed of by this Court quashing the order dated 5th December, 2008. The University was directed to reconsider the matter and take necessary steps in accordance with law after affording fullest opportunity of hearing within a period of two months. After the order of this Court dated 1st September, 2009, the Executive Council of the University met to cons