SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(All) 3154

D.K.ARORA
SITA DEVI – Appellant
Versus
COMMISSIONER, LUCKNOW DIVISION, LUCKNOW – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
S.C. Sitapuri for the Petitioner; S.C. and Suresh Chand Shukla for the Respondents.

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble D.K. Arora, J.—Heard Sri S.C. Sitapuri, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for and on behalf of opposite parties No. 1 and 2 and Sri Suresh Chandra Shukla, learned counsel on behalf of opposite party No. 3.

2. By means of present writ petition the petitioner is seeking a writ of certiorari for quashing the impugned appellate order dated 26.12.2007 passed by the Commissioner, Lucknow Division, Lucknow and order dated 16.7.2007 passed by the Up Zila Adhikari, Sandila, district Hardoi, by which licence of Fair Price Shop of the petitioner has been cancelled.

3. The brief facts of the case as culled out from the pleadings of the writ petition are as under :

4. The petitioner was having a licence of Fair Price Shop of Village Panchayat Kakrali, block Sandila, tehsil Sandila, district Hardoi. It is alleged that on account of extraneous reasons and on the instigation of the village Pradhan, the petitioner’s licence was suspended vide order dated 18.5.2007 on the ground of irregularities committed by the petitioner in distribution of essential commodities. Since the allegations/ charges in the suspension order were vague as no specific charge was de
































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top