Hon’ble Shri Kant Tripathi, J.—Heard the learned counsel for the applicant and the respondent No. 2 and learned AGA for respondent No. 1 and perused the record.

2. These four petitions under Section 482 Cr.P.C. have been filed by the applicant Smt. Usha Gupta against the respondents and the controversy involved in the petitions is common, therefore, they are being disposed of together by this common order.

3. It appears that the respondent No. 2 is a partnership firm involved in the business of sale of paper and materials relating thereto. The applicant Smt. Usha Gupta is the Proprietor of M/s Ultra Pack, Kanpur. The respondent No. 2 and the applicant entered into a commercial contract on which basis the applicant agreed to purchase paper and paper materials from the respondent No. 2. It further appears that several transactions took place between the respondent No. 2 and the applicant and there had been sale of paper and paper materials by the respondent No. 2 to the applicant but according to the complaint, the applicant failed to pay certain amount in regard to few sale transactions due to which the respondent No. 2 filed four different complaints against the applicant i