SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(All) 3062

B.K.NARAYANA
DHANVEER – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
V.S. Sisodia for the Applicants; A.G.A. for the Opposite Parties.

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble B.K. Narayana, J.—Heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned A.G.A. and perused the record.

2. This application under Section 482 Cr. P.C. has been filed by Dhanveer and three others with a prayer for quashing the charge-sheet dated 12.1.2000 (Annexure 6) submitted in N.C.R. No. 311 of 2009 under Sections 323, 504 and 506 I.P.C. and the entire proceedings of Case No. 1113 of 2010; State v. Dhanveer and others, registered against the applicants pursuant to the submission of the aforementioned charge-sheet as well as the summoning order dated 7.5.2010 (Annexure 7) passed by the Judicial Magistrate, Court No. 1, Aligarh.

3. Learned counsel for the applicants submitted that the opposite party No. 2 filed a non-cognizable report on 3.12.2009 at P. S.-Iglas, District-Aligarh against the applicants on the basis of which N.C.R. No. 311 of 2009 under Sections 323, 504 and 506 I.P.C. was registered. The opposite party No. 2 moved an application before the Judicial Magistrate-I, under Section 155 (2) Cr. P.C. with a prayer that the concerned police station be directed to investigate the matter. Pursuant to the order passed on the aforesaid application the matter was












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top