Hon’ble Ashok Srivastava, J.—List has been revised. None is present either from the side of the revisionists or from the side of opposite party No. 2. Learned A.G.A. is present.

I have heard learned A.G.A. and perused the records.

It is evident that both the Courts below have held that the facts of the case are undisputed.

2. A brief mentioning of relevant facts appears necessary. The marriage of revisionist No. 3 was settled with one Manoj s/o opposite party No. 2. The ring-ceremony was solemnized and a number of articles including ornaments were given to revisionist No. 3 at the time of the ring-ceremony. A date of marriage was fixed. Thereafter it came to the knowledge of revisionist No. 3 and her parents that the landed property as was stated to be in the ownership of Manoj was much less and that he was running a liquor shop and there may be a possibility that he may be a possibility that he may be a drunkard. Therefore, the bride side broke the marriage settlement.

3. Feeling aggrieved by their action the opposite party No. 2 filed a complaint case before the learned Magistrate who recorded the statements under Sections 200 and 202 Cr.P.C. Thereafter, the learned Magistrat