SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(All) 3008

SUNIL AMBWANI, KASHI NATH PANDEY
UNION OF INDIA – Appellant
Versus
MANISH KUMAR – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
Ashok Singh and K.C. Sinha, A.S.G.I. for the Appellants; I.P. Yadav, C.S.C. for the Respondents.

JUDGMENT

By the Court.—We have heard Sri Ashok Singh learned counsel for the respondent-appellants, Union of India. Sri I.P. Yadav appears for petitioner-respondent Nos. 1 to 3.

2. Sri Manish Kumar, Sri Raju Singh and Sri Hambir Singh the petitioner-respondents, in this Special Appeal were recruited in the Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF) on 15.2.2003. While undergoing training, on verification of their educational and castes certificates, under Rule 14 of the Central Reserve Police Force Rules 1965, it was found that the High School Certificate of Sri Manish Kumar was forged, and the caste certificates produced by Sri Raju Singh and Sri Hambir Singh were also forged documents and were never issued by the respective Tehsildars. Their services were terminated by the Commandant 151th Battalion CRPF, Kratkhati, Assam on 28.2.2004 under the Central Civil Service (Temporary Service) Rules 1965 with effect from the date of expiry of one month, from the date of service of notice. The petitioners filed a writ petition No. 18832 of 2004, which was dismissed on the ground of alternate remedy of review. In pursuance of the judgement of this court dated 14.5.2004, the review petitions filed






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top