SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(All) 2461

`[2010(8) ADJ 12 (NOC)]
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
BEFORE : MRS. POONAM SRIVASTAV, J.
STATE OF U.P. ......Petitioner
Versus
HARISH CHANDRA AND OTHERS ....Respondents
(Civil Misc. Writ Petition Nos. 17554 and 17553 of 1991, decided on 29th July, 2010)

Advocates:
Counsel :
C.S.C. for the Petitioner; Rajeev Mishra, A.S. Dubey, R.M. Pandey, Prakash Chandra, Virendra Singh and S.C. for the Respondents.

.

Headnote:U.P. Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holdings Act, 1960—Section 10—Surplus land—Land in excess of Ceiling Limit—Notice—Challenge against—Petitioners were issued notice under Seciton 10 whereby it was proposed that one 'C' had surplus land of 4.32 acres—No adjudication on the question as to whether respondent No. 1 was major son of "C" and he had a claim and share in property and whether his claim if taken into consideration then its effect, specially viz-a-viz the land declared surplus—Appellate Authority was of the view that notice issued to respondents was illegal and is liable to be discharged after taking into consideration and allocation of shares of all the major sons—Respondent No. 1 was major son on the date when notice under Ceiling Act was issued—State has not been able to substantiate its case.

       Petitions Dismissed.

       

STATE OF U. P. vs HARISH CHANDRA - 2010 Supreme(All) 2461
Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top