SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(All) 2437

[2010(9) ADJ 10 (NOC)]
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
BEFORE : VINOD PRASAD, J.
MAHENDRA KUMAR AND ANOTHER ....Applicants
Versus
STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER ....Opposite Parties
(Criminal Misc. Application No. 23734 of 2010, decided on 28th July, 2010)

Advocates:
Counsel :
Ravindra Sharma for the Applicants; A.G.A. for the Opposite Parties.

Headnote:(Indian) Electricity Act, 2003 (As Amended in 2007)—Sections 135, 151, 151-A read with Section 151-B, 155, 14, 2(39) and 14—Criminal Procedure Code, 1973—Sections 482, 153, 154,190, 195 and 173—(Indian) Penal Code, 1860—Sections 188 and 268—Charge-sheet—Quashing of—Electricity theft—Complaint—Cognizance of offence taken—Sustainability of—Section 151 of Act does not prohibit lodging of an FIR by an individual person—Taking cognizance of an offence and lodging of an FIR are different legal formalities altogether—Section 151 of Act cannot be an impediment to over ride Section 154 of Cr.P.C.—No illegality in taking cognizance of offence—Award prosecution under Section 135 of Act cannot be quashed.

       Application Dismissed.

       

MAHENDRA KUMAR vs STATE OF U. P. - 2010 Supreme(All) 2437
Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top