Back
Next 
2010 Supreme(All) 3747
[2010(10) ADJ 3 (NOC)]
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
BEFORE : S.C. AGARWAL, J.
Smt. RAJIYA BEGAM ....Revisionist
Versus
STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER ....Opposite Parties
(Criminal Revision No. 1900 of 2010, decided on 22nd October, 2010)
Advocates:
Counsel :
Harish Chandra Mishra for the Revisionist; P.K. Rao, A.G.A. for the Opposite Parties.
Counsel :
Harish Chandra Mishra for the Revisionist; P.K. Rao, A.G.A. for the Opposite Parties.
Headnote:Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000—Section 53—Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Rules, 2007—Rules 12(3)—Juvenile—Declaration of—Appeal by complainant/revisionist was dismsised—Both orders were under challenge—In instant case High School mark-sheet was filed by opposite party No. 2—Which has been relied by Board as well as by Sessions Judge—They rightly did not place any reliance on medical opinion—Even on basis of medical opinion, after giving a margin of one year—Age of opposite party No. 2 comes to about 18 years—Which can very well be below 18 years—Impugned orders passed by Board and Court below sustainable—No ground to interfere.
Revision Dismissed.
RAJIYA BEGAM vs STATE OF U. P. - 2010 Supreme(All) 3747
