AMAR SARAN, ASHOK KUMAR ROOPANWAL, SURENDRA SINGH
FATHER THOMAS – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent
Please provide the content of the legal document (inside
Hon’ble Amar Saran, J.—We have heard Sri. G.S. Chaturvedi Senior Advocate assisted by Sri Samit Gopal, Sri D.S. Mishra and Sri Dileep Gupta Advocates for the private parties and Sri Patanjali Mishra, A.G.A., Sri Neeraj Verma, A.G.A., and Sri D.R. Chaudhari, Governemnt Advocate for the State of U.P. Written arguments and case law were filed by the State. However inspite of time being allowed, no written arguments or case law were filed by the private counsel, except Sri G.S. Chaturvedi, who had filed some case law in 2008 in the leading petition, Crl. Revn. No. 1640 of 2000 on behalf of Father Thomas, and has also supplied us with some additional photocopies of relevant case law.
2. This Full Bench was constituted after an order dated 28.9.01 was passed by the Single Judge (Hon. J.C. Gupta, J), who was examining the power of the Court in a Criminal Revision to question an order of the Magistrate issuing a direction under Section 156(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure (hereafter ‘Cr.P.C’ or ‘the Code’) to the police to register an FIR and to investigate the same.
3. The Single Judge was of the view that as the accused has no locus standi before an order is passed summoning th
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.