NARAYAN SHUKLA
BHARTENDU PRATAP SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent
Hon’ble Shri Narayan Shukla, J.—Heard Mr.U.U.Lalit, Senior Advocate, assisted by Mr.K.S.Pawar, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr.Mahendra Pratap Singh Yadav, learned Government Advocate, Mr.Gopal Swaroop Chaturvedi and Mr.Ravi Kant, Senior Advocates assisted by Mr.C.B.Pandey and Mr. Rohit Tripathi, learned counsels for the opposite parties.
2. The petitioner has prayed for quashing the charge-sheet bearing No. 317 of 2010 dated 8th of November, 2010 as well as the order dated 9th of November, 2010, passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Lucknow in Criminal Case No. 13126 of 2010, whereby the petitioner has been summoned for trial under Sections 420, 465, 467, 468, 471, 120-B of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner has also challenged the order dated 18th of October, 2010, passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Lucknow allowing the application moved by the Investigating Officer to issue direction to the Chief Vigilance Officer/Income Tax Department, New Delhi to provide relevant documents for the purpose of investigation.
3. So far as the relief against the order of providing the relevant documents to the Investigating Officer by the Chief Vigilance Officer
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.