PANKAJ MITHAL
RAVINDRA GIRI GOSWAMI – Appellant
Versus
DARAGANJ RAM LEELA COMMITTEE, DARAGANJ, ALLAHABAD – Respondent
Hon'ble Pankaj Mithal, J.—The plaintiff revisionists have preferred this revision against the judgment and order dated 27.1.2006 passed by the Court of first instance in Original Suit No. 729 of 2005 Ravindra Giri Goswami and another v. Sri Daraganj Ram Leela Committee and another, rejecting the application paper No. 56-A for the impleadment of respondent Nos. 3, 4 and 5 (IInd Set) in the revision.
2. The plaintiff revisionists instituted the above suit for permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants in respect of the property No. 912/566 Daraganj, Pargana and Tehsil- Sadar, Allahabad city having area of 500 sq. yards more particularly described by the boundaries in the plaint on the allegation that the aforesaid property was in the shape of a house belonging to Rai Radha Raman Agrawal which ultimately devolved upon Durgesh Agrawal from whom it was purchased by them vide sale deed dated 10th February 2005. The house was initially numbered as house No. 614 thereafter as 495, 566 and presently 912/566 and that it has fallen down. The defendants-respondents (Ist Set) have no concern with the said property and even Ram Leela functions organized by the them are held a
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.