SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(All) 197

SUDHIR AGARWAL
AMIT RAJ YADAV – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
W.H. Khan and J.H. Khan for the Petitioners; C.S.C. and C.B.Yadav for the Respondents.

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble Sudhir Agarwal, J.—The petitioners have challenged selection for the post of Constable (Civil Police) pursuant to advertisement No. 10-51-2004II. The facts in brief giving rise to the present dispute are as under:

2. An advertisement was published on 7th April, 2006 by the Police Headquarter U.P. Allahabad notifying applications for recruitment of constables. 5404 vacancies in all were advertised for which selection was to be held at 16 centres having vacancies centrewise. In the case in hand, we are concerned with recruitment for selection centre Bulandshahr where 400 vacancies were notified. Petitioner Nos. 1 to 5 and 7 are the candidates belong to other backward class and petitioner No. 6 is general category candidate. The selection consist of three stages i.e. Physical test of 100 marks, written test of 50 marks and interview of 20 marks. All the petitioners having qualified physical test and written test required to appear for interview which was held for about 6 days. It is said that about 4890 candidates were interviewed during this period. The result was declared on 16th June, 2006 wherein petitioners were not selected.

3. This writ petition has been filed imm

































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top