SUDHIR AGARWAL, J.

( 1 ) THIS is not only a frivolous and mischievous petition but also apparently the petitioner has approached this Court with unclean hands by concealing the material facts.

( 2 ) THOUGH the writ petition has been drafted in an innocuous manner, a simple reading of paragraphs 4 and 5 shows that he was initially appointed as Assistant Teacher in Maharana Pratap Purva Madhyamik Vidyalaya Punapar Bhatauli, District Azamgarh (Presently District Mau) on 25th August, 1977 and respondent no. 5 issued approval letter on 25th March, 1982 in respect to the appointment of the petitioner. Para 6 further shows that respondent No. 5 also issued another letter on 12th January, 1983 in respect to the appointment of teachers who were appointed before permanent recognition and granted approval in respect of the appointment of four teachers including the respondent No. 8, ignoring the petitioner and experience certificate claimed to be obtained by the petitioner in 1995 and thereafter he has mentioned that Maharana Pratap Purva Madhyamik Vidyalaya punapar Bhatauli, Mau was upgraded as Uchcha Prathmik Vidyalaya i. e. Junior high School in December, 1996. Again he has said that the r

Click Here to Read the rest of this document