SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(All) 311

ARVIND KUMAR TRIPATHI
SABIRALI FARIDI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U P – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Adarsh Kumar, B.N.Rai,

ARVIND K. TRIPATHI, J.

Counter and rejoinder affidavit has been exchanged.

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned AGA and perused the record.

3. The present writ petition of criminal nature has been filed against the order dated 21. 10. 2008 passed by learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-l, Ballia in Case Crime No. 97/06, State v. Ramesh Yadav, rejecting the release application for release of the truck/vehicle No. U. P.-60/j4644 and the order dated 4. 11. 2008 passed by Special Judge/additional Sessions Judge, Ballia rejecting the criminal revision No. 326/08, Sabir Ali Fridi v. State of U. P. passed against the aforesaid order passed by learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, 1st Ballia.

4. Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the First Information Report was lodged by respondent No. 2 on 15. 9. 2008 at Police Station Garwar, District Ballia, under Section 3/7 Essential Commodities Act, which was registered as Case Crime No. 97/08. There was allegation that the articles to be sold by the fair price shop distribution system were being transported to sell the same in the open market, which was loaded on the aforesaid truck. On the information raid wa







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top