SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(All) 364

V.K.VERMA, SHIV CHARAN SHARMA
RAMESH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U P – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Anil Pathak, Rachna Tiwari, V.S.Parmar,

SHIV CHARAN AND VIJAY KUMAR VERMA, JJ.

Learned AGA has filed ob jection, which be taken on record.

2. Heard Sri V. S. Parmar, learned Counsel for the appellant and learned AGA for the State on the prayer of bail of the appellant Ramesh, who has been convicted and sentenced by Sri S. K. Singh, the then Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court No. 2, Hamirpur in S. T. No. Spl. Case No. 39 of 2002 (State v. Ramesh), under sections 307, 504, 506 IPC and section 3 (2) (V) S. C. /s. T. Act, P. S. Rath, District Hamirpur and perused the record and relevant documents.

3. Learned Counsel for the appellant argued that learned Sessions Judge con victed the appellant for the offence under section 307 IPC and sentenced him to un dergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of 5 years and also imposed fine with de fault stipulation and separately convicted him for the offence under section 3 (2) (V) S. C. /s. T. Act simplicitor and sentenced him to life imprisonment. Learned Counsel for the appellant also contended that there is no material on record to show that the injury sustained by the injured was fatal. He was advised for X-ray, but no X-ray report was produced in the Court to shows that in


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top