HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
R.K.Agrawal, S.P.Mehrotra
GULAB CHANDRA RAM
Versus
STATE OF U P
Decided On : 30 January 2009
Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 3372 of 2009
Article 226 - Quashing of Orders - Government Order dated 29th July, 2004 - Fair Price Shop Agency - Violation of Principles of Natural Justice
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner filed a petition seeking to quash the orders passed by the District Magistrate and Sub-Divisional Magistrate cancelling the allotment of a fair price shop agency in favor of the petitioner. The petitioner argued that the cancellation was illegal and against the principles of natural justice as no show-cause notice was issued and no opportunity to defend was provided.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the cancellation of the allotment was in complete violation of the principles of natural justice and the procedure prescribed in the Government Order dated 29th July, 2004. As a result, the court allowed the writ petition, quashed the orders, and sent the matter back to the District Magistrate to pass appropriate orders afresh in accordance with the law and relevant rules.
Issues: Violation of principles of natural justice, legality of cancellation of fair price shop agency allotment
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the cancellation of the allotment without following the procedure laid down in the Government Order dated 29th July, 2004 and without providing an opportunity to the petitioner to defend was a violation of the principles of natural justice.
Final Decision: The writ petition was allowed, and the orders passed by the District Magistrate and Sub-Divisional Magistrate were quashed. The matter was sent back to the District Magistrate to pass appropriate orders afresh in accordance with the law and relevant rules.
2. It appears that a fair price shop in Gram Panchayat Chilkahar, Block Chilkahar, Tehsil Rasra, district Ballia was allotted to the petitioner on 4th November, 2008. Further, it appears that respondent No. 4 filed a writ petition, being Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 60798 of 2008, before this Court, inter alia, contending that the allotment of the fair price shop agency in favour of the petitioner was contrary to the provisions of Government Orders dated 10th September, 1999 and dated 17th August, 2002. The said writ petition was disposed of by this Court by order dated 25th November, 2008 with the request to the District Magistrate, Ballia to decide the representation made by respondent No. 4 dated 20th October, 2008 strictly in accordance with law by means of a reasoned speaking order, preferably within a period of four weeks from the date a certified copy of the said order dated 25th November, 2008 was filed before him. Pursuant to the said order dated 25th November, 2008, the District Magistrate, Ballia on the basis of the reports of the Sub Divisional Magistrate, Rasra, district Ballia, dated 10th December, 2008 and 24th December, 2008 passed an order dated 25th December, 2008, inter alia, directing for cancellation of the allotment of the fair price shop agency in favour of the petitioner as the same was against the relevant rules. A copy of the said order dated 25th December, 2008 has been filed as Annexure 8 to the writ petition. Pursuant to the said order dated 25th December, 2008, the Sub Divisional Magistrate, Rasra passed an order dated 15th January, 2009 canceling the allotment of fair price shop agency in favour of the petitioner. A copy of the said order dated 15th January, 2009 has been filed as Annexure 9 to the writ petition. There after the petitioner has filed the present writ petition seeking the reliefs as mentioned above.
3. We have heard Sri Satish Kumar Singh Kushwaha, learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent Nos. 1,2 and 3 and Sri Sudhir Kumar Shukla, holding brief of Sri G. P. Tripathi, learned counsel appearing for respondent No. 4 and perused the record. With
the consent of the learned counsel for the parties, the writ petition is being disposed of without calling for the counter affidavit.
4. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that before cancellation of the allotment of the fair price shop agency in favour of the petitioner no show-cause notice was issued to the petitioner nor was he given any opportunity to place his defence before the concerned authority. It is submitted that the procedure required to be followed before cancellation of the allotment of the fair price shop agency, as laid down in the Government Order dated 29th July, 2004, has not been followed in the present case, therefore, the cancellation of the allotment of the fair price shop agency in favour of the petitioner is illegal and against the principles of natural justice.
5. It is not disputed by the learned Stand Counsel as well as by Sri Sudhir Kumar Shukla, learned counsel appearing for respondent No. 4 that the petitioner was not given any show cause notice before cancellation of allotment of the fair price shop agency in favour of the petitioner nor was he given any opportunity to meet the contents of the reports submitted by the Sub Divisional Magistrate, Rasra, district Ballia, on the basis whereof the District Magistrate, Ballia passed the said order dated 25th December, 2008.
6. We have considered the submissions made by the learned counsel
AI
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.