SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(All) 1127

AMAR SARAN, R.D.KHARE
PREM SHANKAR YADAV – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U P – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
C.B.Yadav,

AMAR SARAN AND R. D. KHARE, JJ.

Heard learned Counsel for the peti tioner and learned Additional Government Advocate.

2. This writ petition has been filed for quashing of an FIR at case crime No. 199 of 2009, under section 4- b read with 7/10 of Uttar Pradesh Examinations (Prevention of Unfair Means) Act, 1998, police station Geanpur, lodged by the Dis trict Inspector of Schools, Azamgarh on 21. 3. 2009.

3. Briefly, the allegations in the FIR were that there was information that the examination mafias had leaked out the English I High School paper and were get ting the paper solved by persons connected with different colleges after taking money. Thereupon, the team headed by the District Inspector of Schools and the police force conducted raids at various places in Dis trict Azamgarh on 21. 3. 2009. At about 4. 00 A. M. when the team reached the gate of Sunarika Balika Inter College of which the petitioner was the Manager, the petitioner who was present there at that time and was directing the public to make markings on the paper, fled from the spot. The motor cycles of two persons, who had also fled from the scene were found lying there. On checking the motorcycles were found to c










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top