SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(All) 1448

S.P.MEHROTRA
KULDEEP KUMAR RANA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U P – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
J.S.Bundela, M.A.Mishra, RAVI SHANKER PRASAD,

S. P. MEHROTRA, J.

1. The petitioner has filed the present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, inter alia, praying for issuance of writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents-authorities to appoint the petitioner as Clerk/assistant Teacher (untrained), Basic in District Kaushambi on compassionate ground, and further directing the respondents-authorities to regularize the petitioner, who has worked since last 9 years in place of his father at District-Kaushambi.

2. It is, inter alia, averred in the writ petition that Sundar Lal, father of the petitioner, was initially appointed as Assistant Teacher (Basic) in District-Kaushambi (at that time District-Allahabad) on 16. 1. 1970; and that after sometime, the said Sundar Lal was promoted on the post of Head Master; and that the said Sundar Lal has got blindness in his eyes since the year 1999; and that the said Sundar Lal informed the concerned authorities of the Basic Education Department that he was unable and unfit for teaching work and prayed that in his place the work be given to his son, Kuldeep Kumar Rana, (petitioner); and that the petitioner has been going to School dai


































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top