SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(All) 1507

ALOK KUMAR SINGH
RAGHURAJ – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U P – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
S.P.TIWARI,

ALOK K. SINGH, J.

Heard.

Admit.

Call for the lower court record.

List for hearing on its turn after the record is received.

Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned A. G. A. on the prayer for bail.

The appellant has been convicted and sentenced in Sessions Trial No. 288 of 2007 as under--

1. Under Section 25 Arms Act -One and half years imprisonment with a fine of Rs. 1000/ -.

It is submitted that the punishment is not very severe and the nature of accusation is also not very grave. During trial he was on bail which he never misused. It is also submitted that speedy justice is a fundamental right but the appeal may take a couple of years or even more in its final disposal. The appellant has every hope of success in the appeal.

The bail is, however, opposed by learned A. G. A.

In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances and without entering into merits of the case, I find it to be a fit case for granting bail. Let the appellant (Raghuraj) be enlarged on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Magistrate/court concerned.

However, the fine is not stayed. Let the same be deposited within one month from the dat



Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top