ALOK KUMAR SINGH
RAGHURAJ – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U P – Respondent
Heard.
Admit.
Call for the lower court record.
List for hearing on its turn after the record is received.
Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned A. G. A. on the prayer for bail.
The appellant has been convicted and sentenced in Sessions Trial No. 288 of 2007 as under--
1. Under Section 25 Arms Act -One and half years imprisonment with a fine of Rs. 1000/ -.
It is submitted that the punishment is not very severe and the nature of accusation is also not very grave. During trial he was on bail which he never misused. It is also submitted that speedy justice is a fundamental right but the appeal may take a couple of years or even more in its final disposal. The appellant has every hope of success in the appeal.
The bail is, however, opposed by learned A. G. A.
In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances and without entering into merits of the case, I find it to be a fit case for granting bail. Let the appellant (Raghuraj) be enlarged on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Magistrate/court concerned.
However, the fine is not stayed. Let the same be deposited within one month from the dat
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.