ARUN TANDON
SUMANT KUMAR DUBEY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U P – Respondent
The State Government vide notification dated 13. 04. 00 referred the following dispute to the Labour Court, Lucknow which was registered as Adjudication Case No. 48 of 2000:
"kya Sevayojko Dwara Apne Shramik Sumant Kumar Dubey putra Shri Ram Sagar Dubey Ko Karya Prabharit Amin (Seench Paryavekshak) Ka Padnam Na Diya Jana Uchit Evam Vaidhanik Hai? Yadi Nahi, To Sambandhit Shramik Kya Hitlabh/chatipurti Pane Ka Adhikari Hai Kis Tithi Se Tatha Kis Anya Vivram Sahit?
The Labour Court after examining the pleading of the parties has proceeded to record a categorical finding to the effect that the petitioner was never appointed as Amin (Seench Paryavekshak) after following the procedure prescribed for appointment on the said post neither any advertisement was made nor any selection took place. It has, therefore, been held that the appointment of the petitioner was de hors the rules and thereafter the reference qua his claim for regularization has necessarily to be answered in negative. The Labour Court has also refused the relief of salary qua the post of Amin (Seench Paryavekshak ). Reliance has been placed on the judgment of the Honble Supreme Court in the case of State of
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.